Wayne County-MEA/NEA v. Romulus Community Schools’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.2d 431 · 1984
Citation profile
34 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2010 · most notably Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill (1988), Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc. (1985)
34 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · Zablocki v. Redhail · Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action, which would be removable if sued upon alone, is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters not otherwise within its original jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“An order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1443 of this title [addressing civil rights cases] shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[s]everal decisions show that the appeals courts will liberally construe the district court's reasons for a remand in order to find that the court invoked § 1447(c) and thereby avoid reviewing the challenged order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.