Strittmatter v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.2d 507 · 1984
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably Garfield v. Schweiker (1984), Delgado v. Bowen (1986)
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bertha M. Bittel v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Cummins v. Schweiker · Epps v. Harris · Carter v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Council] was required to determine the physical demands of the particular type of [light] work that this claimant had done and then compare those demands to [his] present capabilities.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“ascertain the demands of that work in relation to the claimant’s present physical capacities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pearson v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.