Allred v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.2d 529 · 1984
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably Polaski v. Heckler (1984), Tucker v. Heckler (1985)
31 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCoy v. Schweiker · Gagnon v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Northcutt v. Califano · Simonson v. Schweiker · Tucker v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] claimant capable of performing sedentary or light work under the guidelines must have the ability to perform the required physical acts day in and day out in the sometimes competitive and stressful conditions in which all people work in the real world.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We have no alternative but to reverse and remand. We do so for three reasons: (1) The Secretary erred in placing the burden of proving that Allred could do light or sedentary work on All-red ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“totally disabled from any physical activities”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Greg Peterson v. SSA
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.