Hermanowski v. Acton Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.2d 921 · 1984
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Lucente v. International Business Machines Corp. (2002), Oscar Gruss & Son, Inc. v. Hollander (2003)
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the measure of damages is the difference between the option price and the market value of the stock ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“substantially for the reasons set forth in the decision of the district court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“damages should be determined as of [the] date [of the breach].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.