Patterson v. Cuyler’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.2d 925 · 1984
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2014 · most notably Miller v. Fenton (1985), United States v. Velasquez (1989)
33 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Townsend v. Sain · Singleton v. Wulff · Rose v. Lundy · Picard v. Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“absent compelling circumstances an appellate court will not consider issues that are raised for the first time on appeal.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(2) that the factfinding procedure employed by the State court was not adequate to afford a full and fair hearing; (3) that the material facts were not adequately developed at the State court hearing; ‡ s¡e sj* H* (6) that the applicant did not receive a full, fair, and adequate hearing in the State court proceeding____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“inescapable conclusion ... that 'factual' conclusions based on questions of historical fact are subject to the presumption in section 2254(d) even when the ultimate issue is characterized as a mixed question of fact and law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Price v. Wainwright
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.