Stokes v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.2d 932 · 1984
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Van Horn v. Schweiker · Wallace v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Van Horn v. Heckler · Mental Health Ass'n of Minnesota v. Heckler · Daring v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Mental impairments. When we assess your impairment because of mental disorders, we consider factors such as your ability to understand, to carry out and remember instructions, and to respond appropriately to supervision, coworkers and work pressures in a work setting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.