Dow v. Virga’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.3d 1041 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Neil v. Biggers · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Manson v. Brathwaite
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“lesser showing of harm ... than under ordinary harmless error review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Panah v. Chappell“[t]he evidence against [petitioner] was weak”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Panah v. Chappell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.