Joffe v. Google, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.3d 1262 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2101 · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 47 U.S.C. § 153 · 7 U.S.C. § 2156
Relies on Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Smith v. United States · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“traditional radio services.” 4 . This case raises a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Phoenix Mem’l Hosp. v. Sebelius, 622 F.3d 1219 , 1224 (9th Cir.2010). We begin by”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“radio communication” is ordinarily a predominantly auditory broadcast or to holding that payload data transmitted over a Wi-Fi network is not a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“radio communication.” See In re U.S. for an Order Authorizing Roving Interception of Oral Commc’ns, 349 F.3d 1132 , 1138 n. 12 (9th Cir.2003) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.