FDIC v. Zucker’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.3d 1344 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 12 U.S.C. § 371C (§ 23a of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913) · 26 U.S.C. § 1501
Relies on Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corporation, Inc. v. England · 241 Ga. App. 703 - Caswell v. Anderson · Horwitz v. Weil · Superintendent of Insurance for the State of New York v. First Central Financial Corp. (In Re First Central Financial Corp.) · 162 Ga. App. 536 - Hortman v. Childress
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Following the BankUnited decision, and implementing the express provision in the instant TSA, we apply state contract law — i.e., Georgia contract law. We note, however, that the outcome of the instant case would not be different if the “Bob Richards rule” were applied. We conclude that the intent of the parties expressed in the TSA — the controlling factor under either Georgia contract law or the federal common law as articulated in the “Bob Richards rule” — created an agency relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When considering the background against which the TSA was entered into, we consider particularly the [1998 Policy Statement].”). . See R. 35 (¶ 173) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.