Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 F.3d 724 - Weigle v. SPX Corp.

Weigle v. SPX Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

729 F.3d 724 · 2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Erie Co v. Tompkins · United States v. Carroll Towing Co. · Ayr-Way Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood Ex Rel. Chitwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defective-design plaintiff must establish that the defective condition rendered the product 'unreasonably dangerous.' " Weigle v. SPX Corp. , 729 F.3d 724 , 735 (7th Cir. 2013) (quoting IND. CODE § 34-20-2-1 ). "[D]efective-design claims sound in negligence, so a party alleging a design defect 'must establish that the manufacturer or seller failed to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances in designing the product.' " Id . at 734 (quoting IND. CODE § 34-20-2-2 ). To demonstrate a design defect under Indiana law, "the plaintiff must compare the costs and benefits of alternative designs”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “requirement that the product be in defective condition focuses on the product itself while the requirement that the product be unreasonably dangerous focuses on the reasonable expectations of the consumer”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “(1) a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; (2) a breach of that duty by the defendant; and (3) an injury to the plaintiff proximately caused by the breach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.