Oshodi v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.3d 883 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Mathews v. Eldridge · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Richardson v. Perales · Goldberg v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. C.J.L.G. v. Barr“In any contested administrative hearing, admission of a party's testimony is particularly essential to a full and fair hearing where credibility is a determinative factor, as it was here.”); Nowacki v. Nowacki, 90 A.D.2d 795 , 455 N.Y.S.2d 406 , 407 (1982) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Volk v. Brame“every individual in removal proceedings is entitled to a full and fair hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. C.J.L.G. v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.