729 F. Supp. 461 - Murphy v. Garrett’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 261 · 10 U.S.C. § 673 · 10 U.S.C. § 802 · 10 U.S.C. § 803 · 10 U.S.C. § 832 · 10 U.S.C. § 867 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Younger v. Harris · Wolff v. McDonnell · Califano v. Sanders · McGee v. International Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our Court of Appeals has held that federal courts have jurisdiction to consider ‘suits for injunctive relief against the military.’ Jorden v. National Guard Bureau, 799 F.2d 99, 109 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 815 , 108 S.Ct. 66 , 98 L.Ed.2d 30 (1987). See also, Dillard v. Brown, 652 F.2d 316 (3d Cir.1981). The Supreme Court has cited injunctive actions as indicative of the type of relief service members may seek in the civilian courts. See, e.g., Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 304-05 , 103 S.Ct. 2362, 2367-2368 , 76 L.Ed.2d 586 (1983) [ (citations omitted) ].... To the extent that [plaintiff] seeks damages from the military, however, we may not entertain such a suit. Jorden, 799 F.2d at 108 (reading Chappell as “laying down a general rule barring damages actions by military personnel against superior officers for constitutional violations”)....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“custodian” for purposes of habeas corpus jurisdiction of a district court was the person within the military who had control over the serviceman at”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.