Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 NE2D 1011 - Marley v. State

Marley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Dobbert v. Florida · United States v. Talbott · United States v. Petty · Sullivan v. Day

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court granted the Motion in Limine with respect to the video tape because of the following Rule 403 analysis: the defense could not lay a foundation for it; the defense could not authenticate it; we do not know the date the video tape was made, or the cireumstances of the sexual encounter; it would be distracting to the jury; and, it would cause an undue consumption of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “raises the issue that the defendant was at the time of the alleged crime suffering from the effects of battery as a result of the past course of conduct of the individual who is the victim of the alleged crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the term 'cobabitant' appears to be one of limited application, meaning ... a person who lives with another as husband and wife or in a comparable sexual relationship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.