Marley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2001
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Dobbert v. Florida · United States v. Talbott · United States v. Petty · Sullivan v. Day
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court granted the Motion in Limine with respect to the video tape because of the following Rule 403 analysis: the defense could not lay a foundation for it; the defense could not authenticate it; we do not know the date the video tape was made, or the cireumstances of the sexual encounter; it would be distracting to the jury; and, it would cause an undue consumption of time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marley v. State“raises the issue that the defendant was at the time of the alleged crime suffering from the effects of battery as a result of the past course of conduct of the individual who is the victim of the alleged crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Marley v. State“the term 'cobabitant' appears to be one of limited application, meaning ... a person who lives with another as husband and wife or in a comparable sexual relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Marley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.