Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 N.E.2d 113 - Ross v. State

Ross v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sanders v. State · Freeman v. State · State v. Pence · Dowd, Warden v. Sullivan · Haymaker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a familiar principle that statutes which are criminal or penal in their nature or which are in derogation of a common-law right must be strictly construed.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In light of the statutory construction favoring more specific statutes as op posed to more general ones and because of the Rule of Lenity, a misdemeanor conviction under the handgun statute, onee elevated to a felony due to a prior felony conviction, should not be enhanced again under the general habitual offender statute.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[When faced with a general statute and a specific statute on the same subject, the more specific one should be applied.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.