Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 P2D 1018 - Destafano v. Grabrian

Destafano v. Grabrian’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Madsen v. Erwin · 101 Mich. App. 537 - Cotton v. Kambly · Goldberg v. Musim · Roy v. Hartogs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the act of a man in enticing a woman to have unlawful intercourse with him by means of persuasion, solicitation, promise, bribes, or other means without the employment of force.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “are based on alienation of affections and criminal conversation, both of which are barred by the `heart balm statute.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Grabrian knew or should have known would lead to additional marital problems between [Robert] and Edna.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.