729 So. 2d 1141 - State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 421 So. 2d 224 - State v. Lewis · 406 So. 2d 1314 - State v. Smith · 673 So. 2d 262 - State v. Green · 684 So. 2d 501 - State v. Pichon · State v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Whenever two or more defendants have been jointly charged in a single indictment or have moved to consolidate their indictments for a joint trial, and are represented by the same retained or appointed counsel or by retained or appointed counsel who are associated in the practice of law, the court shall inquire with respect to such joint representation and shall advise each defendant on the record of his right to separate representation. B. Unless it appears that there is good cause to believe that no conflict of interest is likely to arise, the court shall take such measures as may be appropriate to protect each defendant's right to counsel. [Emphasis supplied.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.