Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 SO2D 527 - Shook v. Alter

Shook v. Alter’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Amend. to Fl. Family Law Rules of Proc. · 455 So. 2d 1325 - In Re Elrod · 658 So. 2d 632 - Lindman v. Ellis · Taylor v. SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARN-HART · 507 So. 2d 1164 - Doe v. Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] civil contempt sanction is coercive in nature and is avoidable through obedience.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.