Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 So. 2d 813 - Shabazz v. State

729 So. 2d 813 - Shabazz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2015

9 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Riggins v. Nevada · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · Conner v. State · 665 So. 2d 852 - Eakes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he admission or exclusion of evidence, photographs in particular, is within the sound discretion of the trial court and that decision will be upheld unless there is an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “we will not review the sentence so imposed, if it is within the prescribed limits of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.