Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 SO2D 95 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2014

15 state decisions

100199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Oliveaux · 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch · 676 So. 2d 1108 - State v. Bradford · 443 So. 2d 522 - State v. Sweeney · 708 So. 2d 1212 - State v. McCorkle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Present sense impression. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the de-clarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter. (2) Excited utterance. A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition. [Emphasis in original.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he statement may follow `immediately' after perceiving an event, allowing only for `the time needed for translating observation into speech.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.