Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 S.W.2d 556 - State v. Ruff

State v. Ruff’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2000

9 state decisions

50198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rogers v. United States · White v. Morgan · State v. Butts · State v. Stewart · State v. Draper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““no person as to whom such records have become closed records shall thereafter ... be held to be guilty of perjury or otherwise of giving a false statement by reason of his failure to recite or acknowledge such arrest or trial in response to any inquiry made of him ...” RSMo § 610.110.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.