¶1(concurring). I would affirm the conviction on the first count under constraint of People v Crandall (53 AD2d 956, affd 45 NY2d 851). For the reasons stated below by Justice Haft (90 Misc 2d 638), I would uphold the legality of the video surveillance. Hence, I would also affirm the conviction upon the third count.
73 A.D.2d 136
People v. Teicher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 21, 1980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1980-02-21
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2017
1 federal appellate ·
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-02-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →