Scarpuzza v. Blum’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
May 1981
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(17) include reasonable standards (which shall be comparable for all groups . .) for determining eligibility for and the extent of medical assistance under the plan which . (B) provide for taking into account only such income and resources as are, as determined in accordance with standards prescribed by the Secretary, available to the applicant or recipient and (in the case of an applicant who would, except for income and resources, be eligible [to receive . SSI benefits i. e. the categorically needy]) as would not be disregarded ... in determining his eligibility for such aid, assistance or benefits.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Caldwell v. Blum“a voluntary transfer of property (i) for the purpose of qualifying for such [medical] assistance, or (ii) for the purpose of defeating any current or future right to recovery of medical assistance paid, or for the purpose of qualifying for, continuing eligibility for or increasing need for medical assistance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.