Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 Ala. 385

Connor v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1882

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1882-12-15

Apaeal from Pike Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. Jno. A. Foster. The bill in this cause was filed by Nancy Boyd, a judgment creditor of Thomas Connor, against the latter, seeking a discovery of property liable to the satisfaction of her judgment, and a decree condemning the property to sale for that purpose.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1882-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1915

4 state decisions

201882189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRICKELL, C. J.

¶1— There are cases in which it may be proper for the court of chancery to ascertain the compensation which ought to be paid solicitors, and to direct its payment’ from funds in the custody, or under the control of the court. There are other cases in which trustees, executors, administrators, or guardians are parties, and the court may very properly ascertain the compensation of the solicitors they have employed. But in ordinary cases, there is no ground or reason for the interference of the court between the solicitor and client; certainly no ground or reason for such interference as was indulged in this cause, depriving the'client of the unquestioned right to make such settlement of the suit as he may choose, and rendering a decree against' his adversary for the compensation of his solicitor. ■

¶2*387The decree of the 26th May, 1881, is reversed and the canse remanded.

/73/ala/385 · .json · Public domain