Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Ariz. 11 - Smith v. Phlegar

Smith v. Phlegar’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 1995

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions

7019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Connell v. Walker · Ruby v. United Sugar Companies, S. A. · United Mercantile Agencies, Inc. v. Innis · Sligh v. Watson · Crone v. Amado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not enough to say that it is necessary to make the contract fair, that it ought to have contained a stipulation which is not found in it, or that without such covenant it would be improvident, unwise, or operate unjustly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.