Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Cal. App. 4th 1194 - Hoffman v. Connell

73 Cal. App. 4th 1194 - Hoffman v. Connell’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 2044 · 26 U.S.C. § 2056 · 26 U.S.C. § 2207A

Relies on Morgan v. Commissioner · Helvering v. Stuart · Eh McDowell 83-3008 v. Paiewonsky 83-3007 · Flitcroft v. Commissioner · 10 Cal. App. 3d 1082 - Reagh v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, there is no estate tax in California. This policy is set forth in Revenue and Taxation Code section 13301, which provides, `Neither the state nor any political subdivision of the state, shall impose any gift, inheritance, succession, legacy, income, or estate tax ... on the estate or inheritance of any person ... by reason of any transfer occurring by reason of a death.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.