Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Cal. App. 4th 472 - Record v. Reason

73 Cal. App. 4th 472 - Record v. Reason’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
5
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

73 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 13 Cal. 3d 804 - Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co. · 6 Cal. 4th 666 - Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center · 3 Cal. 4th 296 - Knight v. Jewett · 3 Cal. 4th 339 - Ford v. Gouin · 32 Cal. App. 4th 248 - Ferrari v. Grand Canyon Dories

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is done for enjoyment or thrill, requires physical exertion as well as elements of skill, and involves a challenge containing a potential risk of injury.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'has wide discretion in allowing the amendment of any pleading [citations], [and] as a matter of policy the ruling of the trial court in such matters will be upheld unless a manifest or gross abuse of discretion is shown'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “].) Record explained that "tube riders engage in the activity of tubing in order to experience the thrill of whipping across the water at speeds [that] challenge their ability to stay on the tube. Both appellant and respondent testified via deposition that falling out of the inner tube is a 'common occurrence' and that '[e]verybody falls off the innertube.' Neither appellant's preexisting injuries nor his admonition to respondent to '[k]ick back' and 'take it easy' can be used to define the nature of the activity or the parties' relationship to it. Nor can these factors be used to redefine the ordinary range of activity and the concomitant risks inherent in the sport and thus enlarge the potential liability of coparticipants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.