Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Conn. 1 - Dunnett v. Thornton

Dunnett v. Thornton’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably State v. Clemente (1974), Woodmont Ass'n v. Town of Milford (1912)

36 state decisions

7019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Craft Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co. · Lovell v. Hammond Co. · New York Breweries Corp. v. Baker · Pond v. Smith · Morehouse v. Throckmorton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “centers on the obligation to pay a sum certain arising upon an examination by the parties of unsettled claims of indebtedness, and an agreement between them that all the articles are true and a particular sum remains due. This obligation may arise when there is no express promise to pay the particular sum, as where mutual claims are set off one against the other, and a resultant balance agreed upon as due. . . . It is not essential to the support of this obligation that an actual examination by the parties of the items of indebtedness should be proved; it is sufficient that the conduct of the parties is equivalent to such examination and to an agreement upon a specific sum and a promise to pay that sum. . . . The essential and controlling fact upon which the obligation arises is an agreement between the parties that items of indebtedness, before open to dispute, are true and amount to a particular sum agreed upon as due from the defendant to the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.