Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 CONNAPP 338 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably 2002 Pa. Super. 383 - Commonwealth v. Reppert (2002), 80 Conn. App. 26 - State v. Bangulescu (2003)

50 state decisions

330200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · United States v. Wade · Hernandez v. New York · State v. Golding · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On January 24, 1999, at approximately 3:30 a.m., Jackson and [the petitioner], along with Steven Brown, entered the Dixwell Deli [deli] on Dixwell Avenue in New Haven, wearing masks and carrying handguns. As [the petitioner] entered the deli, he fired five or six shots from a nine millimeter pistol. One bullet struck Caprice Hardy, a customer, and killed him. A second bullet struck Abby Yousif, an owner of the deli, in the shoulder. Brown and Jackson followed [the petitioner] into the deli.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “During the course of the robbery, two customers, one of whom was Kend[e]ll Thompson, entered the deli. Upon entering, each individual was forced to the ground at gunpoint and ordered to turn over whatever money they possessed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.