Friedman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
October 1975
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Friedman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Illuminating articles and parts thereof, of base metal: Other: 653.35 Table, floor and other port- able lamps for indoor illumination, of brass .... 8% ad val. Other: 653.37 Of brass............15% ad val. Articles not specially provided for of a type used for household, table, or kitchen use; * " t all the foregoing and parts thereof, of metal: Articles, wares, and parts, of base metal, not coated or plated with precious metal. Of copper: 654.00 Of brass............ 8% ad val. * ** * * Subpart 6 headnotes: 1. This subpart covers only articles of metal which are not more specifically provided for elsewhere in the tariff schedules. Articles of copper, not coated or plated with precious metal: * * * * * * .35 Other ................ 10 per lb. + 12% ad val.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.