Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 F.1d 196 - Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe

Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe’s Empirical Analysis

73 F. 196 · 1896

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2003 · most notably Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises (1985), Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. (1911)

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

90189619001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Milwaukee and St Paul Railway Company v. Apms et al. · Palmer v. . De Witt · Voltz v. . Blackmar · Stacy v. Portland Publishing Co. · Maxwell v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The copies which were given to the members of the committee on ceremonies and to a so-called ‘Literary Committee’ were delivered to them solely to enable them to decide whether the poem was one suitable and worthy of their acceptance as the ode to be delivered at the opening exercises. Such a delivery of copies of a literary production is not a publication, and could not prejudice the owner’s common-law rights. Bartlette v. Crittenden, 4 McLean, 300 , Fed. Cas. No. 1,082; Bartlett v. Crittenden, 5 McLean, 32 , Fed. Cas. No. 1,076.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Received Chicago, the 23d day of September, 1S92, from the World’s Columbian Exposition, $1,000 in full payment for ode composed by me. It is understood and agreed that said Exposition Company shall have the right to furnish copies for publication to the newspaper press of the world and copies for free disposition if desired, and may also publish same in the official history of the Dedicatory Ceremonies; and subject to the concession herein made, the author expressly reserves her copyright therein.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.