Charnley v. Sibley’s Empirical Analysis
73 F. 980 · 1896
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1946
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Behan · North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co. · Dushane v. Benedict · Northern Pacific Railroad v. Hambly · Wiggins v. Burkham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A claim is liquidated only when the amount of it has been determined, or the data settled upon which the amount can be calculated.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Flato
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.