Pryor v. Strawn’s Empirical Analysis
73 F.2d 595 · 1934
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 1964
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. Hurley · May Department Stores Co. v. Bell · Wharton v. Ætna Life Ins. · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cook O'Brien Const. Co. · Barshfield v. Vucklich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that the reading to the jury of a statute which lays down the measure of duty of a defendant is not error. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cook-O'Brien Construction Co. (C.C.A.8) 69 F. (2d) 462; Sommer v. Carbon Hill Coal Co. (C.C.A.9) 107 F. 230.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.