Aderhold v. England

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 16, 1934.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1934-10-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1968

1 counsel of record

Relies on England v. Aderhold

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1934-10-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1See, also, (C. C. A.) 67 F.(2d) 248.

¶2Lawrence S. Camp, U. S. Atty., H. T. Nichols, Sp. Atty., and Ike K. Hay, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

¶3Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5By this appeal the warden of the Atlanta Penitentiary contends that the district judge erred in computing deductions from a second *92sentence imposed upon appellee, a prisoner in the penitentiary. The facts upon which the District Court acted are not shown by the petition, or by any evidence in the record.

¶6It follows that the judgment must be, and it is, affirmed.