Edwards v. Aderhold

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 21, 1934.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1934-12-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1961

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Knewel v. Egan · Aderhold v. Hugart · Pellegrino v. Aderhold

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1934-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In forma pauperis.

¶2Edison J. Edwards, in pro. per.

¶3Lawrence S. Camp, U. S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Carrollton, Ga., and H. T. Nichols, Sp. Asst, to U. S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

¶4Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6On the authority of Knewel v. Egan, 268 U. S. 442, 45 S. Ct. 522, 69 L. Ed. 1036; Pellegrino v. Aderhold (C. C. A.) 55 F.(2d) 1074; Aderhold v. Hugart (C. C. A.) 67 F.(2d) 247, the judgment is affirmed.