United States v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis
73 F.3d 1067 · 1996
Citation profile
75 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. David (1996), United States v. Rogers (1997)
75 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1963 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1968 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Ashe v. Swenson · Griffith v. Kentucky · Allen v. United States · United States v. Bass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant traveled in interstate commerce with the intent to promote unlawful activity and thereafter actually did promote or attempt to promote the unlawful activity.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“each transaction or transfer of money constitutes a separate offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.