Richenberg v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
73 F.3d 172 · 1995
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2017
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 654
Relies on Sampson v. Murray · Rostker v. Goldberg · Goldman v. Weinberger · Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations Authority · Able v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a substantial likelihood of success on the merits ... must be the standard when considering whether to grant a preliminary injunction preventing the implementation of a statute that was the product of lengthy public debate involving both Congress and the President.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“appears to me to be at best questionable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.