Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 F.3d 229 - United States v. Dayea

United States v. Dayea’s Empirical Analysis

73 F.3d 229 · 1995

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
December 2013
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2013

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

50199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742

Relies on Hughey v. United States · McFadden v. Derwinski · United States v. Smith · United States v. Hicks · United States v. Mullins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) pay an amount equal to the cost of necessary medical and related professional services and devices relating to physical, psychiatric, and psychological care, including nonmedical care and treatment rendered in accordance with a method of healing recognized by the law of the place of treatment; (B) pay an amount equal to the cost of necessary physical and occupational therapy and rehabilitation; and (C) reimburse the victim for income lost by such victim as a result of such offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Section 3663(b)(2) limits its own applicability to cases in which the offense caused a bodily injury to “a victim.” In such cases, a court may order the defendant to “reimburse the victim for income lost by such victim as a result of such offense.” Section 3663(b)(2)(C). This use of the phrase “the victim” (as opposed, for instance, to “any victim”) indicates that “the victim” of § 3663(b)(2)(C) must refer to the same “victim” as the first clause of § 3663(b)(2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “legality of a restitution order de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.