United States v. Kimball’s Empirical Analysis
73 F.3d 269 · 1995
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. McVeigh (1998), United States v. Hardwell (1996)
41 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Liteky et al United States · Huddleston v. United States · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · New Jersey v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is a 'very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Evidence of other crimes should not be suppressed when those facts come in as res gestae--as part and parcel of the proof of the offense [ ] charged in the indictment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review de novo the ultimate issue of the constitutionality of identification procedures, although we review the underlying factual basis for the district court decision for clear error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.