Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 F.3d 356

Docket No. 95-7068.

Antonelli v. Gonzalez

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: November 16, 1995. Decided: December 21, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-12-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2013

1 district ·

Relies on Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Evans v. Croom · Ali v. Al-Faisal al-Riyadh International Corporation

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael C. Antonelli, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition for mandamus relief. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We also deny as moot Appellant's motion for release on bond pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/73/f3d/356 · .json · Public domain