Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 F.3d 357

Docket No. 95-7362.

Farmer v. Pennington

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 12, 1995 Decided Jan. 5, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-05

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Hubert Lee James v. Continental Training Services, Incorporated, T/a Superior Training John Doe Larry Cho

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-05

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dee Deidre Farmer, William Cherry, Appellants Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farmer v. Pennington, No. CA-95-440-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/73/f3d/357 · .json · Public domain