Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 F.3d 357

Docket No. 95-7235.

Johnson v. Lanham

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995. Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-04

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Hubert Lee James v. Continental Training Services, Incorporated, T/a Superior Training John Doe Larry Cho

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Schaefer, Nos. CA-94-3153-JFM; CA-94-3267-JFM (D.Md. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/73/f3d/357 · .json · Public domain