Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 F.3d 357

Docket No. 95-7527.

Jones v. Lawson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-05

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Hubert Lee James v. Continental Training Services, Incorporated, T/a Superior Training John Doe Larry Cho

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-05

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se. SY W.D.Va.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appealg and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Lawson, No. CA-95-1025-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 19, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

*

We gather from Appellant's notice of appeal and informal brief to this court that he believes that those documents have begun the exhaustion process. In order to satisfy the exhaustion requirement of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(b), (c), Appellant must initiate a separate proceeding in state court

/73/f3d/357 · .json · Public domain