Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 F.3d 358

Docket No. 95-7279.

Kevin McCray v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: December 14, 1995. Decided: December 21, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-12-21

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2017

1 district ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Anderson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter Limbaugh, Robert Thomas King, Willcox, McLeod, Buyck, Baker & Williams, P.A., Florence, SC, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Harrell, No. CA-94-2338-6-3AK (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/73/f3d/358 · .json · Public domain