Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 F.3d 591 - Ables v. Scott

Ables v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

73 F.3d 591 · 1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · New Jersey v. New York · Lee v. Brown · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In habeas corpus proceedings, we review allegedly improper prosecutorial statements made during a state trial to determine whether they 'so infected the [penalty phase of the] trial with unfairness as to make the resulting [sentence] a denial of due process.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.