Schneider v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
73 F.3d 610 · 1996
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Victor v. Nebraska · Cage v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If you entertain a reasonable doubt as to any fact or element necessary to constitute the defendant's guilt, it is your duty to give him the benefit of that doubt and return a verdict of not guilty . . . . It must be such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof. A reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt. It is an actual substantial doubt. It is a doubt that a reasonable man can seriously entertain. What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that there is no reasonable likelihood that the jury ... applied the instruction in a way that violated the Constitution”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a serious sensible doubt as such you could give a good reason for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.