Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 F.3d 610 - Schneider v. Day

Schneider v. Day’s Empirical Analysis

73 F.3d 610 · 1996

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Victor v. Nebraska · Cage v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If you entertain a reasonable doubt as to any fact or element necessary to constitute the defendant's guilt, it is your duty to give him the benefit of that doubt and return a verdict of not guilty . . . . It must be such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof. A reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt. It is an actual substantial doubt. It is a doubt that a reasonable man can seriously entertain. What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that there is no reasonable likelihood that the jury ... applied the instruction in a way that violated the Constitution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a serious sensible doubt as such you could give a good reason for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.