Chappell v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis

73 F.3d 918 · 1996

Citation profile

cited by 27 later decisions

states following

March 2022

most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles (1998), Thornton

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Pierson v. Ray · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc. · Briscoe v. W

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[i]n passing RICO, Congress did not evince a 'clear legislative intent’ to displace common-law immunities’ ”). 25 . Further, Plaintiff-Growers general incorporation of various materials ignores Local Rule 15.1, which states,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Rogers v. McDorman · 330 F. Supp. 2d 1101 - Matsuura v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.
“a clear intent to abrogate legislators' common law immunity”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Day v. Johns Hopkins Health Sys. Corp. · Michael Day, Jr. v. Johns Hopkins Health System
“ad hoc decisionmaking, or the formulation of policy;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles · Chateaubriand v. Gaspard

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.