¶1 Menghsteab Araia petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his application for asylum. Araia argues that the evidence shows that he has a well-founded fear of persecution in both Eritrea and Ethiopia and that he is a “refugee” within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1158. Araia, however, fails to show a particularized connection between the feared persecution and his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. Faddoul v. INS, 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir.1994).
¶2 Araia does not challenge the denial of his application for withholding of removal. That issue is, therefore, deemed abandoned. See Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS, 809 F.2d 1050, 1052 (5th Cir.1986) (issues not briefed are waived). Araia’s contention that the decision of the Immigration Judge contains an error relative to Araia’s statement about his citizenship is incorrect.
¶3 Araia’s petition is DENIED. His motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.