Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 FAPPX 777 - Sturges v. Pepper

Sturges v. Pepper’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2011
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Little v. Liquid Air Corp. · Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc. · Ford v. Elsbury

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In deciding a Rule 59(e) motion the district court should consider the following non-inclusive factors: ‘(1) the reasons for the plaintiffs’ default, (2) the importance of the evidence to the plaintiffs’ case, (3) whether the evidence was available to plaintiffs before they responded to the summary judgment motion, and (4) the likelihood that the defendants will suffer unfair prejudice if the case is reopened.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.