Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 FLA 764 - Warren v. Warren

Warren v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2001 · most notably McDougald v. Jenson (1986), Minick v. Minick (1933)

1 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

1001917192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hilton v. Guyot · Anderson v. Watt · Prall v. Prall · Dunstan v. . Higgins · Smith v. Croom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, then, the defendant at the time the bill was filed was not ‘actually, legally, and bona fide domiciled in this state as a citizen thereof,’ the court was without jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed for in the bill, because, as was said in the Miller case [Miller v. Miller, supra] it is not within the spirit and intent of the statutes to which reference has been made to confer upon our courts the power to interfere in any respect with the marital status of citizens of other states who may be here only on a temporary visit, either to pass upon such status or to enforce any of the rights and duties that depend thereon.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Under section 1933 the power of the court to grant alimony upon the grounds that a cause for divorce exists is dependent upon the complainant’s residence in this state having continued for two years before the application for the relief is made, whereas under section 1934 our courts have jurisdiction to enforce the duty of maintenance and support due from a husband to the wife, where one of the parties ‘is actually, legally, and bona fide domiciled in this State as a citizen thereof.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * shall have resided and had his habitation, domicile, home, and place of permanent abode in Florida for one year, and in the county for six months, * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.