Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 FSUPP 281 - Doyle v. Milton

Doyle v. Milton’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
November 1990
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 1990

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

80194719501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on United States v. American Trucking Associations · Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co. · Arnstein v. Porter · Johnson v. United States · Chambers & Marshall v. Baldwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ [Presumably a proxy statement may be false or misleading if it omits data from which the inference of selfish motive may be drawn. Our question is narrower: Assuming the data are supplied, is the proxy statement nevertheless false if it omits a confession of selfish motive. ****** “Until the Commission speaks my answer * * * is no.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““* * * Qijle Investment Company Act is a carefully framed statute in which Congress has, with particularity, stated the means and methods, both judicial and administrative, by which its declaration of policy is to be executed. It has not confided in the courts a broad discretion to shape judicially contrived remedies for the mischief it has discovered. Insofar as power is entrusted to the courts under this Act its exercise must, of course, be steered toward the fulfillment of the national policy as declared. The policy itself, however, when declared in a statute as comprehensive and detailed as this Act, does not authorize the courts to fashion sanctions withheld by Congress. See Stone, The Common Law in the U.S. 1936, 50 H.L.R. 4, 13.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.